97 LGUs Show Non-Compliance to Road Clearing, DILG

The Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) said that the efforts of general road clearing was successful. Why? Because only 97 of the 1,245 local government units (LGUs) all over the Philippines have been proven to be non-compliant. Therefore, these LGUs will be shown cause orders by the DILG.

97 LGUs show non-compliance to mass road clearing
This image was taken from Top Gear Philippines | topgear.com.ph

Read: Twenty (20) New Tollways, to be Added in SCTEX for Less Traffic Congestion

Back in August, LGUs started to embark on road clearing operations to abide by the orders of our dear President, Rodrigo Duterte. The DILG reported that the massive road clearing was of “general success” but it still shows that a total of 97 LGUs have shown non-compliance.

Eduardo M. Año, DILG Secretary said that he was happy that he was able to see the commitment and participation of the LGUs.

Read: DILG Reminds Dental and Medical Clinics for their Exemption from Business and Mayor’s Permits

I want to express my happiness for the commitment and active participation by LGUs across the country towards this campaign. Sa kabila ng mga balakid at pagsubok na kanilang dinaanan, masasabi ko pong malaking bahagdan o porsyento ng mga pamahalaang lokal sa bansa ang nakiisa sa ating layunin. Salamat po sa inyo!”

In Translation: Even amidst the obstacles and problems they faced, I can truly say that this has been a big step or percent in local government in the country to see that we are one—that we have one goal. Thank you very much!

What about the 97 LGUs that has shown non-compliance?

According to Año, the LGus who have been observed to be non-compliant are given five (5) days from their receipt of the Show Cause Orders (SOCs) for them to explain why they are non-compliant. If no response is received, then the DILG will have no choice but to submit their names to the President and file necessary and significant complaints; this can be escalated further to the Office of the Ombudsman.

Read: Sagip Saka Act, Signed by President Duterte

Following the strenuous validation efforts of the DILG, ninety-seven (97) LGUs all over the country which were non-compliant will be issued Show Cause Orders today. These were LGUs that garnered a failed rating in the validation conducted by the Department. We hope that their reasons are acceptable so that we do not need to file cases against them.”

Out of the 97 non-compliant LGUs, eleven (11) LGUs are from Region I; one (1) each from Regions II and III; seven (7) from MIMAROPA; ten (10) from Region V; one (1) from Region VI; twelve (12) from Region VII; nine (9) from Region VIII; eighteen (18) from Region IX; thirteen (13) from Region X; three (3) for Regions XI and XII; and four (4) from Regions XIII and CAR.

Metro Manila had outstanding performance

In addition to the data gathered by the DILG, they said that the non-compliance of the 97 LGUs must not outweigh the outstanding performance of LGUs in the cities of the Metro.

Read: Different Job Opportunities from Different Philippine Government Departments

As per the DILG Validation Teams, One (1) LGU was noted to have a Low Compliance Rate; four (4) LGUs had a Medium Compliance Rating; and a total of twelve (12) Metro Manila LGUs had a High Compliance Rating. This was considered to be an outstanding performance based on what most people think of Metro Manila.

Which LGUs were non-compliant?

Taking it from the Assessment and Validation Ratings – MC 2019-121 (as of October the 8th, 2019), the following local government units (LGUs) were observed to be the non-compliant of the road clearing operations.

Region

Province

LGU

Remarks

I

Ilocos Norte

Badoc

Failed

I

Ilocos Norte

Paoay

Failed

I

Ilocos Norte

Pinili

Failed

I

Ilocos Sur

Cabugao

Failed

I

Ilocos Sur

Salcedo

Failed

I

Ilocos Sur

Sinait

Failed

I

La Union

Luna

Failed

I

La Union

Sudipen

Failed

I

Pangasinan

Mangatarem

Failed

I

Pangasinan

Natividad

Failed

I

Pangasinan

Tayug

Failed

II

Isabela

Roxas

Failed

III

Pampanga

Minalin

Failed

IV-B

Or. Mindoro

Baco

Failed

IV-B

Or. Mindoro

Pinamalayan

Failed

IV-B

Or. Mindoro

Socorro

Failed

IV-B

Palawan

Aborlan

Failed

IV-B

Palawan

Dumaran

Failed

IV-B

Romblon

Calatrava

Failed

IV-B

Romblon

Santa Maria

Failed

V

Camarines Norte

Basud

Failed

V

Camarines Norte

San Vicente

Failed

V

Camarines Norte

Talisay

Failed

V

Camarines Sur

Gainza

Failed

V

Catanduanes

Bato

Failed

V

Masbate

Cawayan

Failed

V

Masbate

Pio V. Corpuz

Failed

V

Masbate

San Fernando

Failed

V

Masbate

San Jacinto

Failed

V

Sorsogon

Matnog

Failed

VI

Negros Occidental

Binalbagan

Failed

VII

Bohol

Antequera

Failed

VII

Bohol

Garcia Hernandez

Failed

VII

Bohol

Talibon

Failed

VII

Bohol

Valencia

Failed

VII

Cebu

Carcar City

Failed

VII

Cebu

Badian

Failed

VII

Cebu

Carmen

Failed

VII

Cebu

Compostela

Failed

VII

Cebu

Ginatilan

Failed

VII

Cebu

Moalboal

Failed

VII

Cebu

Pinamungajan

Failed

VII

Siquijor

Larena

Failed

VIII

Leyte

Babatngon

Failed

VIII

Leyte

Baurauen

Failed

VIII

Leyte

Dagami

Failed

VIII

Leyte

La Paz

Failed

VIII

Leyte

Palompon

Failed

VIII

Leyte

Tabontabon

Failed

VIII

Leyte

Tunga

Failed

VIII

N. Samar

San Isidro

Failed

IX

Zam. del Norte

Leon B. Postigo

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

Aurora

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

Dinas

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

Dumalinao

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

Dumingag

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

Lakewood

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

Lapuyan

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

Margosatubig

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

Pitogo

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

San Pablo

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

Tabina

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

Tigbao

Failed

IX

Zam. del Sur

Vincenzi A. Sagun

Failed

IX

Zam. Sibugay

Alicia

Failed

IX

Zam. Sibugay

Kabasalan

Failed

IX

Zam. Sibugay

Mabuhay

Failed

IX

Zam. Sibugay

Olutanga

Failed

IX

Zam. Sibugay

Titay

Failed

X

Bukidnon

Baungon

Failed

X

Bukidnon

Damulog

Failed

X

Bukidnon

Manolo Fortich

Failed

X

Bukidnon

Sumilao

Failed

X

Camiguin

Mambajao

Failed

X

Camiguin

Catarman

Failed

X

Camiguin

Guinsiliban

Failed

X

Camiguin

Mahinog

Failed

X

Camiguin

Sagay

Failed

X

Lanao del Norte

Tagoloan

Failed

X

Misamis Or.

Balingoan

Failed

X

Misamis Or.

Manticao

Failed

X

Misamis Or.

Tagoloan

Failed

XI

Davao del Sur

Santa Cruz

Failed

XI

Davao Or.

Caraga

Failed

XI

Davao Or.

Governor Generoso

Failed

XII

Cotabato

Kidapawan City

Failed

XII

S. Cotabato

Polomolok

Failed

XII

S. Cotabato

T’boli

Failed

XIII

Agusan d. N

Santiago

Failed

XIII

Agusan d. N

Tubay

Failed

XIII

Dinagat Islands

Loreto

Failed

XIII

Surigao d. N

General Luna

Failed

CAR

Abra

Boliney

Failed

CAR

Abra

Manabo

Failed

CAR

Benguet

Kabayan

Failed

CAR

Ifugao

Banaue

Failed

As you can see in the table, the non-compliant LGUs are diversified but the most was seen in Region IX. This just means that this region needs to comply with the request of the DILG to avoid further problems and escalation to the Office of the Ombudsman.

Nationwide Compliance: How did we do?

According to Año, a total of 1,148 LGUs passed the DILG validation. 328 registered to High Compliance Rating, 497 for Medium Compliance; while 323 under Low Compliance. Nevertheless, it’s safe to say that we were able to comply great of the total LGUs in the country.

In addition to that, he further praised Regions II, III, VII, XII, and CAR for being the regions that were highly compliant to the mass road clearing.

The regions did not disappoint. We are happy to share that our road clearing campaign is also thriving in all parts of the country as mirrored through the numbers from our validation efforts.”

Año said that the DILG, together with other government agencies in the country, are continuing to report, observe, and cooperate with each other to ensure that the program will be a success even in the future.

Read: Another Proposal to Resolve the EDSA Traffic Dilemma, Submitted by a Lawmaker

We therefore urge the public to continue reporting and be vigilant and cooperate to ensure the long-term success of the program.”

Hopefully, this compliance assessment by the DILG would remain to be in process to ensure that our roads will be clear from obstruction; resulting to better flow in traffic.

Source: DILG Website | List of LGUs non-compliant

Enter your email address to get notifications of new Job Postings, Scholarships and other updates.

Join 93.5K other subscribers


Leave a Reply